Realistically Speaking
Is What We're Seeing Real?
A moon landing hoax?
"To the Moon and back." Or was that our true history? It must be. It was on the front cover of the Washington Post. This photo contains a personal collection of moon landing front page headlines and big as LIFE magazines. I never knew why my mom kept these, til now. It seems these days everywhere you look, there's some new found distant space dirt or some optically attractive space-van-go. So why is this? Let me tell you why. If there is a mass educated idea that is in question, it makes for a strenuous mountain climb to entertain any other conflicting theory. If one agency controlled the research and flow of information, how can someone look to a competing agency for another view point or evidence? Not only would there be no available information, it would be a difficult conversation to have with anyone you want to maintain a relationship with. Even if it's your best buddy at church! So my question started with "why haven't we been to the moon in 50 years"? I've seen an interview of a NASA employee saying "we've lost the technology". How do you loose that? Even astronauts are admitting "we didn't really go to the moon" says Buzz Aldrin to a young girl on video. Today NASA says they can't go past the Van Allen Belt because of radiation and need to stay in Low Earth Orbit, but they could in the 1967(?) NASA Engineer Admits- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4O5dPsu66Kw
There are unanswered questions:
Why was there a photo of the earth from the moon on the wall of the oval office while President Nixon's phone call he had with the astronauts in space?
Why was the return time response in the communications less than the speed of sound?
Why were the shadows in the video on the moon at different angles?
Why was the rock they brought back from space after testing found to be petrified wood?
Why is the boot foot print in the photos different from the boots displayed in the Smithsonian?
Why is there a reflection of stage lights in the astronauts helmet?
The first image to the left is a View of Earth rising over Moon's horizon taken from Apollo 11 spacecraft in 1969. The second image to the right is one taken more recently. Both are from the NASA website. Now look at the two "Images" and compare the size of the earth to the moon. They contradict one another. The earth should be much larger in the first. So after much research myself, I found out how easily it is to deceive humanity with moving pictures and pretty lights! The moon landing was taped by Stanley Kuberick in a Hollywood studio. Later the music band "Red Hot Chili Peppers" would have lyrics in a famous song describing this and no one would bat an eye. Pre-taped for the world to watch. And this would only be successful if one of the three letter agencies orchestrated it. CIA!! Over time the deception has gotten so deep seated its hard to find a beginning or even truth. But having a yearly budget of $25 billion makes you wonder what is NASA doing with all that dough. Apparently, not going to the Moon! But we do have beautifully created art called IMAGES. I could go so much deeper into this subject, but for now we will "just scratch the surface". There's so many internet resources that purposely lead with "misinformation" to protect the money making agencies, its hard for someone to know where to start. If this is something of interest to you, I would recommend checking out…
"NASA admits we never went to the moon" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qN9yKoWUscg&list=PL-iWDOyz1IdpPCDjouaXGcUmsr4U6zFe-&index=5&t=26s
NASA fraud by Justin Witsit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJnwl5aiBSk
Apollo 11 Post Flight Interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLm_sm1wrxs&t=64s
Language Analysis of Neil Armstrong Says He Lied to You https://youtu.be/GvdOziAs0hw?si=FcOQsMwkl5ZmggTa
Robert Simmon "Mr. Blue Marble" https://youtu.be/u0I-H5VMBmY
And Here We Are Today
The IM-1 Mission has landed on the moon February 22, 2024 after over 50 years we have returned but wait. We didn’t really return, we had sent a privately owned and managed vehicle named Odysseus by Intuitive Machines. If anyone would just do a little research, they would see the inconsistency in earth images. I will leave a link to the “reported” mission below, but I would like for you to look at the two comparison images I’ve added, and think about what size Australia really is. And no, that's not Africa. You would think NASA would have more to offer other than a couple of distorted fisheye lens "images" for the 120 million. A Lunar Landing Blunder I would call it! Again I will say "we are just scratching the surface today.
NASA News Conference on Intuitive Machines' First Lunar Landing
Believe nothing, question everything
By Lucy 2/28/24
For nothing is secret, that shall not be made manifest; neither any thing hid, that shall not be known and come abroad. Luke 8:17
